(Potpourri) Slow news day? Try no news day. I've got a fair amount of links for you, but the industry itself has been amazingly quiet -- which means that five minutes after I post this, something wacky's gonna happen, I just know it. Here's what I found:
- Simply Comics' Babar reminds me that the 2004 Comic Book Legal Defense Fund membership drive is now underway. Yes, this is a hint.
- Alan David Doane asks AiT/Planetlar publisher Larry Young five questions. Second link, and we've already moved on to the interviews -- told you nothing happened today.
- Towards the bottom of the first page of Richard Johnston's latest Waiting For Tommy column, former New X-Men artist Ethan Van Sciver provides an interesting look at Marvel editorial practices, in a "driving by a car crash" sort of way.
- Variety.com comics weblogger Tom McLean speaks with Rick Spears and Rob G, creators of the self-published comic book Teenagers From Mars.
- Movie Poop Shoot's Chris Allen interviews genre writer/editor Tony Isabella, and continues his Publishers' Report Card for 2003.
- British newspaper The East Grinstead Observer profiles local small-press cartoonist Garen Ewing, creator of the comic-book series The Rainbow Orchid.
- Over at Silver Bullet Comics, Clifford Meth continues his campaign to shame Marvel into doing right by Dave Cockrum. I remain dubious; Marvel can't even be shamed into doing right by Stan Lee, for crying out loud. I should also note that in recounting the sad story of Superman creators Jerry Siegel and Joe Shuster, Meth mangles a few of the facts. Fortunately, Mark Evanier is onhand to offer corrections.
- Newsarama begins a new manga review column, courtesy of Troy Brownfield. Stay for the comments section below, where an opening volley of "Ewww, manga sucks!" gets repulsed by a smarter variety of comics fan.
- Here's a couple of links from our old pal Rick Bradford. University of Georgia student newspaper The Red and Black offers a round-up of the growing small-press festival known as FLUKE 2004. Cartoonist Ben T. Steckler has a report on the festival as well. (Standard disclaimer: that last link is to a newer Blogspot site, so the permalinks don't work. The item in question is currently the topmost item for February 2nd, titled "Athens, GA: Outside In.")
- Writing for Toronto's Eye Weekly, Guy Leshinski tries to parse what the hell we're talking about when we refer to "graphic novels." (Thanks to Jeff Mason for emailing me the link.)
- Your conflict-of-interest link of the day: Shawn Hoke reviews the David Greenberger-edited collection of Duplex Planet comic strips, No More Shaves, for Broken Frontiers (temporary link).
- Your other conflict-of-interest post of the day: in case you missed the news, Fantagraphics will not in fact be publishing the second volume of David B.'s graphic novel Epileptic. Instead, Pantheon Books will be releasing a collection that combines both volumes under a single cover. (Incidentally, if I write about books my employer isn't publishing, is it still a conflict of interest?) Anyway, Tim O'Neil has heard the howls of outrage, but can't figure out how any of this is bad news. (Another disclaimer: that last link blah blah blah Blogspot site, blah blah permalinks don't work, blah blah blah blah February 4th, blah blah "TEMPEST IN A TEAPOT.")
- Legomancer's Dave continues the "Why not just superheroes?" meme begun by John Jakala and Ed Cunard (follow-up). I touched on this subject a bit in an interview mentioned below, but my full thoughts on the subject can be found here. (Link via NeilAlien.)
- Tim Broderick (Blogspot, no links, February 4th) thinks that recent news of manga's growth only proves his point that bookstore shelves are lost to independent publishers. I maintain that the bookstore market is not the Direct Market -- it's much bigger and more diverse, for one thing -- and there thus doesn't need to be a crossover effect between manga and Western comics for the latter to make a place for themselves in bookstores. Eventually, one of us will be proven right, one way or the other.
- Speaking of manga: Adam Stephanides (Blogspot, no links, February 4th) reviews a Japanese anthology of cartoonists interpreting various fairy tales of the Brothers Grimm.
- Monitor Duty's Christopher Arndt responds to a new Alex Ross interview in The Onion by lamenting the way that pinko-bastard painter's "most notorious work," Uncle Sam, gets so much attention. As a conservative myself, I'm a tad bewildered by this attitude. What exactly is so "notorious" about this graphic novel? Shay's Rebellion wasn't a betrayal of the newly-articulated American dream? The American march to the West Coast didn't result in a mountain of dead Native Americans? Politicians aren't corrupt? Arndt seems to base some of his criticism on the fact that the graphic novel in question was inspired in part by Howard Zinn's A People's History of the United States, but I'm not sure why this is relevant -- I hate to be the guy who breaks it to Arndt, but that a socialist believes something is insufficient evidence that it's untrue. A critical examination of American history is not by definition left or right, but rather closer to or further from the truth, depending on the work under discussion. Arndt may well have reason to dislike Uncle Sam, but if you're going to claim that a given work's politics are flawed, you should at least have the decency to say why you think this to be the case.
- It occurs to me that I'm going to keep linking to David Fiore's ongoing analysis of Watchmen until he gets bored and finds another subject -- he's just that good. Today's topic: how the mask ate Rorschach.
- Last week's L.A. Weekly featured a one-page strip containing the welcome return of Bob Callahan & Spain Rodriguez' Dark Hotel. Here's hoping we see more. (Link via Egon.)
Finally, let's consider two contrasting quotes. Here's the first:
"[...] Neilalien just doesn't see the value in questions like Cunard's (not being snarky here either) -- it sounds like an attempt to grok why hyper-fans of stamp collecting don't collect coins too. If one wants a larger readership for Baraka and Black Magic in Morocco, challenging the superhero enjoyer to check it out (just by default because they are already familiar with the medium, its language, the layout of the shop, etc.?) doesn't seem like the answer. Markets for non-superhero comics need to be rebuilt from outside the happy and fully-serviced superhero comic market."
Note carefully that last sentence; there'll be a test or something, I'm sure. Here's the second quote, a response to comments about the above excerpt that I made in my interview for Alan David Doane's weblog:
"In the entry Journalista linked to in the interview, Neilalien suggested to Ed Cunard (it wasn't that personal, let's say it was suggested to the comic snob in general) that bullying superhero enjoyers to buy something else (who are under no desire nor obligation to buy anything else besides superheroes until they die off) would not be as effective for improving the fortunes of alt/art/indy/smallpress comic books as outreach and marketing for these books to people outside of the superhero reading population. Simple enough. But Journalista equates that with (a) 'expounding upon the theory that comics shops are for superheroes, while bookstores are for everything else', and (b) 'asking creators, publishers, distributors and retailers to accept [the dwindling direct market as the superhero-reading population ages and dies off] as a good thing'.
"So the question is how the fuck does this weblog's post actually say those things, or even lead to them.
"And who would be moronic enough to think (b) anyway? Geez Louise, give this website a little more credit. Journalista essentially says that Neilalien wants retailers to fail, or that this website nurtures attitudes that puts time limits on shops, that Neilalien wants you to 'accept as a good thing' that a retailer or creator could no longer feed his/her family. Wrong and disgusting, at best."
There is a bit more to Neil's defense -- he seems to equate my stated disinterest in the superhero genre with some sort of attack on superhero fans, if my reading of his first point is correct. I'm not entirely sure it is correct, but it's the closest I can come to making heads or tails of Neil's point. In any case, it misrepresents my stated remarks every bit as much as Neil claims I misrepresented his.
Neil also errs in stating that "Journalista essentially says that Neilalien wants retailers to fail," and that I have therefore somehow insulted him. Again, this is a misrepresentation. I said that the attitude represented in the first quote would eventually lead to the downfall of the Direct Market, but I don't think Neil holds it becuase he wants to see retailers on the unemployment line. I just don't think he'd thought things through when he wrote the statement quoted above.
Beyond that, I'm not sure what else to say. I believe that the "happy and fully-serviced superhero comic market," which to the best of my (admittedly limited) ability to estimate is roughly 70-80% of the Direct Market, is headed for a slow but steady decline, for reasons enumerated in the disputed interview. I believe Neilalien, as the most experienced and (I suspect) popular of the superhero webloggers, is open to criticism and attempts at refutation when he champions this market against intrusion by people who question its ability to survive solely upon a closed, non-replenishing readership. I believe this can be done without insult or rancor, and I believe I have in fact done so. Certainly, Neil has certainly never had a problem criticising my arguments in the past, which I should hasten to add is all to the good. Indeed, he's even been up for the occasional bout of name-calling when it suited his purposes, which in turn I should hasten to add is of no real concern to me -- I'm certainly not above such behavior myself, after all. That said, I believe that nothing I've said recently has involved anything which a reasonable adult would consider "much to Neilalien's insult." I believe Neilalien is taking this shit way too personally.